Ecopsychology and the Climate Crisis: Giving space to ecological emotions

​

In recent years, the climate crisis has become an increasingly present part of our everyday lives. Heatwaves, extreme weather events, wildfires, droughts, and biodiversity loss are no longer distant news stories—they are realities that many people experience firsthand.

Alongside the environmental consequences, significant psychological impacts are also becoming more evident.

An increasing number of people, especially young people, report feelings of anxiety or eco-anxiety, sadness or ecological grief, anger, and helplessness when thinking about the future of our planet. It is also common to worry about what future generations may face or to grieve the transformation of places that feel deeply meaningful and familiar.

To describe these experiences, terms such as eco-anxiety, climate anxiety, ecological grief, and solastalgia have emerged. Solastalgia refers to the distress people experience when the environment they consider home undergoes unwanted change.

Ecopsychology offers a different way of understanding these emotions.

Rather than viewing them as problems to eliminate, it encourages us to listen to them and explore their meaning.

The question therefore shifts from:

"How can I stop feeling anxious?"

to:

"What is this emotion trying to tell me?"

In many cases, anxiety arises from love for what we risk losing. Grief may reflect the deep bond that connects us to the places, animals, and ecosystems that sustain our lives.

Acknowledging these emotions does not mean giving up. Instead, it allows us to transform them into motivation to act, strengthen our sense of community, and cultivate a more conscious relationship with the natural world.

​

Eco-Anxiety and Ecological Emotions: Understanding Distress to Inspire Action

Within ecopsychology, the emotional responses triggered by the ecological and climate crisis are understood as ecological emotions—natural reactions that arise from the profound connection between human beings and the environment.

Among these, eco-anxiety is one of the most common. It is characterized by persistent concern about the future of the planet and the consequences of ecological and climate change. Although it is often associated with climate anxiety, eco-anxiety more broadly refers to the distress caused by environmental degradation, regardless of its specific cause.

Eco-anxiety is not a mental disorder in itself. Rather, it is a natural and understandable response to a real and ongoing threat. When experienced at manageable levels, it can increase awareness and motivate people to act in ways that align with their values. It becomes problematic when it leads to persistent intrusive thoughts, feelings of paralysis or guilt, or physical symptoms that interfere with daily life.

From a psychological perspective, our bodies respond to the climate crisis much as they would to any perceived danger by activating the stress response. However, because climate change is a complex and global challenge with no immediate solution, this activation often remains unresolved, contributing to ongoing anxiety and helplessness.

Research suggests that some groups may be particularly vulnerable, including young people, climate activists, environmental professionals, and communities directly affected by climate change. Feelings of political inaction or inadequate institutional responses can further intensify emotional distress.

Ecopsychology invites us to see these emotions not as something to suppress, but as valuable signals. Ecological emotions reflect what matters most to us: protecting life, promoting justice, caring for future generations, and maintaining our sense of belonging within the natural world.

One of the first steps in managing eco-anxiety is learning to recognize and accept our emotions without judgment. Fear may coexist with sadness, anger, ecological grief, or guilt. Simply naming these emotions can foster greater self-awareness and emotional regulation.

The body also plays an important role. Breathing exercises, mindfulness practices, and grounding techniques can help reduce the physiological activation associated with anxiety while interrupting catastrophic thinking. At the same time, it is helpful to avoid constant exposure to alarming news. Staying informed is important, but doing so in a balanced way prevents us from remaining in a chronic state of alert.

Social connection is another essential resource. Talking openly about climate-related concerns, joining local initiatives, or becoming part of a supportive community can reduce feelings of isolation and strengthen psychological resilience.

Equally important is transforming concern into meaningful action. Focusing exclusively on what we cannot control tends to increase helplessness, whereas engaging in practical, especially collective, actions restores a sense of agency. It is important to remember that the climate crisis is a systemic challenge: responsibility does not rest solely on individuals but requires broader social, economic, and political change.

Finally, reconnecting with nature is one of the most effective approaches promoted by ecopsychology. Spending time outdoors, observing natural landscapes, or simply caring for a plant can enhance emotional well-being and reinforce our sense of belonging to the living world. Reconnecting with nature does not mean ignoring the climate crisis; rather, it helps us relate to it with greater balance, awareness, and hope.

If eco-anxiety becomes so intense that it interferes with sleep, work, study, or relationships or if it is linked to traumatic experiences related to climate events, it may be helpful to seek support from a mental health professional.

Eco-anxiety is a deeply human response to a changing planet. By embracing our ecological emotions, caring for our psychological well-being, and transforming concern into meaningful participation, we can face this challenge with greater resilience and awareness. The goal is not to eliminate fear, but to allow it to guide individual and collective action toward a more sustainable future.

​

To read my short guide, click here, or  to explore other articles I have published relating to ecopsychology and climate psychology, click  here.

To schedule an appointment for ecoanxiety psychotherapy, contact me here.

​

References:

Bratman G. N., Anderson C. B., Berman M. G., Cochran B., de Vries S., Flanders J., Folke C., Frumkin H., Gross J. J., Hartig T., Kahn P. H., Kuo M., Lawler J. J., Levin P. S., Lindahl T., Meyer-Lindenberg A., Mitchell R., Ouyang Z., Roe J., …& Daily G. C. (2019). Nature and mental health: An ecosystem service perspective. Science Advances, 5, eaax0903–eaax0903.

Brosch, T. (2025). From individual to collective climate emotions and actions: A review. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 61, Article 101466.

Clayton, S., Manning, C., Krygsman, K., & Speiser, M. (2017). Mental health and our changing climate. APA. https://doi.org/10.1037/e538772017-001

De Jong, A., Harris, S., Costanian, C., & Skinner, H. (2025). Climate cafés as a space for navigating climate emotions: A scoping review. The Journal of Climate Change and Health, 24, Article 100466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joclim.2025.100466

Hickman, C., et al. (2021). Climate anxiety in children and young people. The Lancet Planetary Health, 5(12), e863–e873. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(21)00278-3

Kasser, T. (2017). Living both well and sustainably. Social Issues and Policy Review, 11(1), 101–149. https://doi.org/10.1111/sipr.12021

Wilson, E. O. (1984). Biophilia. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674045231

​